Joey

The Snapchat Shift

I don’t like Snapchat.

I probably should have preceded that statement with a request for the young whippersnappers to get off my lawn. It seems common for me to have less enthusiasm for the “progress” that gets made each passing year, and my aversion to Snapchat probably seems to be more of the same. However, my issue is not with the app, but with the principle behind it.

Image sharing is nothing new. Instagram is the big name in one-to-many sharing (and Flikr before it, and Photobucket before that, and Xanga before that…). One-to-one photo sharing is effectively done by WhatsApp and Viber, and before them, BBM and plain MMS.

Why is Snapchat so popular? I’ll admit that it’s got lots of creative filters, though it’s rather creepy that they want location data in order to access some of them. That’s certainly part of it. There has to be more to it though, because face filters have come on Logitech webcams for a decade.

I submit that Snapchat’s big selling point is its 24-hour retention. I say this because Snapchat has spent a nontrivial amount of time enforcing that limit. The only apps that are more stringent about not installing on rooted Android phones are ones related to money like Samsung Pay. The reason for this is because there are modifications that make it possible to save pictures and videos beyond the one-day retention, and apparently the possibility of such a function is sufficiently concerning that it warrants some of the most comprehensive root checking procedures on the market. For this to be with anyone’s time, enforcement must be a feature worth protecting. In other words, one of the most popular apps on the market today is popular because it deletes data and makes it nearly impossible to avoid.

I’m pretty obsessive about data retention. My data is pretty solidly backed up, and I’ve got a 9TB NAS making that possible. I seldom lose data because I’m really big on making sure it’s available to me even if something breaks. Even my blog can be restored in a few hours if HostGator decides to pull my account. Snapchat is the antithesis of backing data up. Data that has value is forcibly deleted – and that is a core tenet of the app.

Now, I know one of the main reasons this is popular – girls send guys naughty pictures (and, probably, the other way around) and are more likely to do so because they don’t have to worry about them disseminating around the internet. Most internet progress depends on porn – it sure wasn’t Amazon that normalized online payments, Netflix wasn’t the first to stream video, and the proliferation of broadband was, to be fair, partially Napster.

Amongst the things that worries me is whether Snapchat really deletes the pictures – there’s not really a way to prove it, but if they don’t, they’re undoubtedly sitting on a massive bed of what is legally considered child porn. I would not want to be in charge of something like that…but I digress.

Now, I’m certain that a handful of astute readers are trying to put two and two together and assume I’m saying something like this: Snapchat is used to send nudes, and Joey is concerned about data retention, therefore he wants to keep naughty pictures but can’t and is complaining about it under the guise of data integrity. No. Not what I’m saying at all. Nobody has ever sent me a nude photo using any service, including Snapchat. I’m saying that its popularity for one reason inevitably leads to its use in others. Pictures of events worth remembering get the same fate at images worth keeping, and so do text-based communications. Snapchat does not distinguish, and that is my point of contention. They are two separate concepts.

Ultimately, the fact that Snapchat treats data as disposable is a mindset that I simply can’t get behind. “So don’t use it, Joey!” Don’t worry, I don’t – but the point I’m making isn’t because I don’t like the app itself, so much as I have concerns regarding the change it represents. Treating data as fleeting and disposable is a cultural shift that I don’t believe is a positive direction.

Now, I shall formally request that the whippersnappers get off my lawn. I have surveillance footage…and it won’t be gone tomorrow.

January 5, 2017 by Computers and Tech 0

No, Tim Cook shouldn’t be fired…but he does need some courage.

This blog post is mostly a response to a video my friend Arnoldo posted, which poses the question of whether Tim Cook and/or Johnny Ives should be fired from Apple, given the direction they’ve been taking as of late. Youtube doesn’t allow comments of this length, so luckily I have a blog where I can say as much as I want. Since this is largely a response to their video, I’ll assume it’s been watched.

What seemed to have been the catalyst for this thought exercise was the 2016 Macbook Pro – there is no shortage of criticism for it, no matter how interesting the touch bar might be. Arnoldo is willing to overlook the USB-C ports, but I’m not, and the reasoning is simple: my objection isn’t the existence of USB-C, it’s the exclusivity. What would have made a lot more sense would have been to have two standard USB ports and two USB-C ports. This handles a transition period far better than the current setup and poises itself as a transition device that accommodates existing peripherals – including the iPhone – far better than the current requirements. Yes, I am looking forward to USB-C becoming a common standard over the next several years, even if that means I’ll need adapters in the other direction…but without peripherals that leverage the port, it comes across as arrogance far more than forward thinking. Furthermore, I think it was Dane who cited the usage of USB-C in the most recent crop of Chromebooks. I think Chromebooks fill the netbook niche pretty well and are great for people who can do most of their work in The Cloud™, but comparing the functionality of a product line whose core use case is a web browser and generally costs $300 or less with a product line whose base model is $1,800 and intended for professional users is a bit disingenuous.

Arnoldo’s main objection was the integrated storage. I can’t disagree with him, but then again, my last four laptops (including my current one) have all had at least two hard disks, a configuration that was only possible on Apple machines through the use of aftermarket solutions, and only on machines that shipped with an optical drive. I too object to this, but to me, the writing has been on the wall for years in this respect. Last year, I upgraded a client’s 128GB SSD in their 2013 Macbook Air to a 256GB model. Why did I upgrade to 256 instead of 512, and why did I spend over $300 for it? Because that was the only option available. For years, Macbooks have used a connector that was different than the rest of the industry. It’s not proprietary per se, but the tech industry has had mSATA for years, and more recently NGFF, both of which have plenty of bandwidth and would have afforded all the I/O throughput necessary for blazing fast performance. Given that Apple hasn’t gotten much grief for a pseudoproprietary connector, and that soldered-in RAM was first introduced in the 2012 Retina Macbook without massive blowback, it doesn’t seem all that surprising that the storage would end up a part of the logic board.

On a springboard from this, I would disagree with Kevin’s assessment regarding the Secure Enclave being the reason for the storage being soldered on, for a number of reasons. First, Apple would have had to redesign anyway from a purely physical standpoint – they’re not using iPhone storage in their Macbooks. Additionally, Intel and (to a lesser extent) Samsung both have hardware-based encryption in their SSDs. If it is a secure enclave thing, I submit that integrating such a technology into a removable drive is entirely possible as other OEMs are already doing it. Furthermore, the San Bernadino iPhone case had nothing to do with a secure enclave, since the iPhone 5C did not possess one. The case precedent set there was that, although Apple was capable of writing and signing a firmware update that would allow the FBI to try to unlock the phone 10,000 times, Apple could not be legally compelled to write the software to do it. The reason Apple did not write that firmware was philosophical, not technological.

The topic of processing was also discussed at length. I’ll agree with Kevin on this one – if Apple is going to continue making “thin” a core selling point, CPUs are pretty close to their limits due to power and cooling. On a similar note, that would have been my answer with respect to the AMD question. Yes, my laptop is a Wintel/nVidia model, and my VMWare box is as well…but my FreeNAS and my router are both AMD-based, because the Sempron 145 can handle both of those adequately in 35 watts with $30 chips, and a four-year-old Phenom X4 that uses 65W is still plenty powerful for a media workstation at a church where I have a desk. AMD is also pretty good at being more power-efficient in their GPUs, especially in the fanless segment. Perhaps there was some cost-based leverage involved, but even Steve Jobs spent time expressing the importance of performance per watt. I still rock an i7 in my laptop, and to be honest, AMD isn’t all that great at the high end. The low end, and the power conscious end, however, is AMDs house. MacBooks have never been about having amazing specs. I respect the ingenuity used here to get Crysis running on a Macbook, but I would love to see Johnny Ives react to the use of an external GPU like that. I know about a dozen Macbook Airs are needed to match the weight of my 2011 Origin PC EON17 (thus separating their target demographics), but 21fps at 1280×800 with the ‘medium’ system spec and 2xAA is a joke compared to the 95fps I got on my current EON17x with those settings. With everything set to ‘maximum’ at 1920×1080 got me 31fps, going down pretty close to that 21fps region in some particularly complex areas with fog and shading. In my defense though, The GTX965M was the lowest end GPU the laptop came with when I bought it. Perhaps I’m due for an upgrade. I’m interested in any Crysis 3 benchmarks for the 2016 Macbook, so if there are any around, let me know.

Let’s talk about Apple’s support cycle for a moment, because I can both appreciate it and hate it at the same time. Apple provides excellent support and is still surprisingly liberal with their policy of handing over new Macbooks during Applecare. They’re also pretty good about allowing OSX updates to be compatible with older models. However, once you’re EOL, you’re SOL. If a computer isn’t supported, there’s not even a “best effort” attempt to get it working – the system simply will refuse to install. In comparison, a few enterprising PC enthusiasts managed to run Windows XP on an 8MHz processor. It is certainly not something anyone would ever wish to do for any other reason than “because you can”, but they could – and they did. Even Windows 10 runs on 12-year-old hardware. It’s probably nothing I would wish upon anyone I even remotely cared about, but it does show a fundamental difference between the two systems. On a tangentially related note, the forced Windows 10 installs were something I was not happy Microsoft was doing, but when there’s a new iOS update, my iPhone asks me multiple times daily to install it. Sure, it won’t actually install without permission, but the fact that it’s impossible to tell the iPhone to wait until I manually perform the update is the kind of behavior that is only one step above the forced installs and is by no means an example for anyone to follow.

I’ve considered attempting the Hackint0sh route on my EON17x as a proof of concept – My EON17x does have UEFI, which my old unit does not. However, this raises its own set of questions. First, how does this jive with the thought that the Macbooks will end up on ARM in the next few iterations? With a different instruction set, it’s only a matter of time before the hackint0sh community is going to be stuck developing some sort of abstraction layer yet again. Even if not, Apple is not new to the cat-and-mouse game – jailbreaking is almost as old as the iPhone itself, the hackint0sh dates back pretty far, and even Bootcamp was predated by a few enterprising individuals. However, I would argue that Apple cares more now than they used to in the past. Apple is no stranger to DRM, and while Psystar may not have gone about things the right way, Apple isn’t afraid of the courtroom, either. However, I would again argue that Arnoldo, Kevin, Dane, and myself are not Apple’s target demographic anymore. If Apple sold a copy of OSX that could run on basically anything with the rules of “never, ever ask us for support”, we’d all probably buy it and install it on whatever non-Apple hardware we prefer. However, what Apple sells, and what most people like Apple for, is the experience. No calling India for support, no finger pointing between vendors, just a seamless transition from “the thing is broken” to “the thing is fixed”, in a visually appealing and simple to use form factor that is generally less prone to viruses and malware. I don’t think the hackint0sh fits that bill. Even if Dell or Razer or Origin or Samsung made a laptop that had language like, “run any OS you want….really, any BSD-based OS…Ten different OSes and more…we’re compatible with all the OSes, even if it isn’t Windows or Linux…run whatever OS you want while climbing El Capitan, you maverick, you lion, you snow leopard, you!” in their marketing material, it would be the polar opposite of the Apple experience – Samsung isn’t going to actually give support for OSX, and Apple sure isn’t, either. I’m fine with that, Arnoldo seems to be fine with that, but I don’t see it growing beyond its current size, not the least of which because ISO downloads are still the foray of the shady side of the internet. Moreover, the fact that the ability to disable Secure Boot is now purely at the discretion of the OEM puts the rise of the hackint0sh in even greater jeopardy.

I’ll close by answering the question of whether Tim or Johnny (or both) should be fired. I don’t think either of them should. I’ll give them some benefit of the doubt that Steve was not only a one-in-a-billion, but also had good timing and market sense. The Diamond Rio was relatively popular before the iPod took it to school due to the excellent iTunes integration and simpler interface. The Blackberry Curve had basically every feature of the first-gen iPhone and then some, but Steve knew that the user experience outweighed the spec sheet, and a phone with half the features but flawless execution would compete well. The market as a whole is looking for the next blockbuster product, and I question whether even Steve Jobs would have been able to envision and release another game changing product since the iPad simply due to market forces and the state of consumer electronics. I fault neither Tim nor Johnny for this reality.

I do, however, think they need some more courage. Not their definition of courage, mine. The courage to do exactly what Dane said, and release a Macbook that’s an inch thick and can fit four M.2 SSDs, is 5 pounds, and gets 3-5 hours of battery life because its midrange i7 and Geforce 1060 can finally put the Macbook on the map. They need the courage to ask whether it’s possible to have a shelf that showcases both “the best Facebook machine money can buy” and “a laptop that can render graphics from Motion in a sane amount of time” side by side. The courage to stop sidelining their professional users and prove that they can cater to the graphic designers and musicians as well as the college kids and soccer moms. The courage to tell the shareholders that Apple cannot – and should not – be expecting to keep exponentially growing forever. Tim should have the courage to tell Johnny that he wants a Macbook that can render a given Motion project in half the time of the present Macbook, regardless of how thick it is. Johnny should have the courage to attempt a dual-processor Macbook that can run iOS apps natively and tell Tim that it’d be a perfect way to pitch the magic of a dual-screen Macbook.

Now, for me personally, I’m in the Origin PC niche, and will remain there for the foreseeable future. My laptops may be heavy, they may be expensive, but my laptop presently has 3.5TB of storage space (room for 8TB), 16GB of RAM (room for 64) and a GeForce 965M (room for a pair of 1070s), and I get support that even Apple must rival. OSX is a great system that I do like using when I have to work on a Mac, and when Tim and Johnny have the courage to build a behemoth like mine I’ll definitely take a long, hard look at it. Until then, I’ll let them both get incredibly rich off their present offerings, keep my work iPhone close at hand, and revel in the performance I get from a laptop that has never kept me waiting for anything.

Edit: Performed benchmarks in Crysis 3 and reflected observed numbers in the graphics comparison.

December 1, 2016 by Computers and Tech 1

Fireproof: The Movie Loved By Christians Who Don’t Have High Standards

At the behest of a reader and stemming from an in person discussion, I present to you my rant.

For back story, Fireproof is a 2008 movie from the Christian movie production studio Sherwood Pictures. It is intended to show God’s grace and providence as a couple headed for divorce makes a last ditch effort to avoid the fate. I think the premise is noble, and I’m certainly not opposed to what it’s ultimately trying to say. “It means well”, though I’m certain anyone who read the title of this blog post knows what’s coming. I’m certainly not entirely on board with Jim Sterling’s critique in its entirety, though you’re going to see some overlap…

Let’s get past the terrible visual effects of the houses on fire (not once did I ever believe anything was aflame), and the awkward dialog that isn’t rivaled by half the Writing Prompts on Reddit, Kirk Cameron’s inability to actually act like someone who’s upset with their wife, and focus on the massive plot point problems.

First off, in the initial “I want out” scene, Cameron very clearly avoids using the word “bitch”. Why was this? Because it was a Christian movie…and we can’t have swearing in a Christian movie! Nevermind that they were both unsaved at that point, they were talking about divorce and an allusion was made to causing her physical harm, and Cameron expresses a litany of derogatory remarks toward her…but the use of an expletive is where they apparently drew the line. This sort of double standard illustrates a chronic problem I see amidst Christian culture that while the Bible says, “Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth”, unwholesome words did proceed from his mouth, but somehow what was actually said was acceptable, while the word “bitch” was not. While we’re focusing on this scene, we’ll keep in mind a very important thing that happened: SHE was the one who said “I want out”. Not him. This will become important later.

So Cameron, still an unsaved person at this point in the movie, goes to his dad who says to do ‘The Love Dare’. Now, that scene right there so heavily wreaked of product placement it seemed like it was a scene right out of The Truman Show…but whatever. To be fair, my bias might have something to do with the fact that most displays at Christian bookstores at the time had the movie and the book displayed right next to each other. So, unsaved man agrees to follow a book firmly rooted in scripture and Christian principles for…reasons, I guess. “But he really loved her inside!” Yes, yes, I know…but the kind of things The Love Dare encouraged him to do were massive steps of faith for someone who doesn’t already have some level of faith in God, and it wasn’t until far later in the movie that his wife expresses any form of positive response. Remember: she said “I want out” and he has no faith in Christ at this point, so there’s basically no reason for him to agree to it…but we’ll assume that God was working in his heart anyway, because plot.

Meanwhile, she’s found this doctor guy who treats her like a valuable person, a heavy contrast to her husband. And, to the shock of no one, she’s drawn to him. And…they kiss. Why does she do this? Because she feels no love from her husband – literally every woman I’ve spoken to, saved or not, has resonated with the appeal of a wealthy doctor taking an interest in them when their husband is busy giving her mostly-dead flowers. As a side note, literally no guy I have ever known who is making even a halfhearted attempt to express appreciation for their significant other is dumb enough to give below-gas-station-quality flowers. It is perfectly possible to take the same $20 and go to a supermarket and get something far more presentable. While the scene was intended to illustrate laziness, it came across as the opposite, because finding flowers that dead takes effort.

So, through some heavy-handed parallels with his firefighting career, and dialog about this with his firefighting buddies – y’know…because avoiding a looming divorce is exactly the kind of thing that people talk about at a fire station. Again, we’re dealing with unsaved people…save the one-dimensional guy who is only there to illustrate the perfect marriage and say “it’s hard work sometimes” when showing zero struggles and a wife who responds positively to him.

Now, as the wife and the doctor are getting closer, our unsaved husband continues on The Love Dare with no feedback (I lied: he gets feedback in the form of a longer to-do list). Then, he has his ‘Come to Jesus’ moment. Incredible a gift as Christ’s salvation is, Christian movies have distilled it into this highly cliché moment that is the second most predictable scene in a Christian movie – the first being the “I don’t need God” guy dying in a car accident toward the end but before the ultimately-happy ending for the saved people. In fairness, film does have limits to how exactly one can visualize a change in heart. That brings us to the third most cliché scene in the Christian movie genre…

The post-salvation cleansing montage! Yes, he got rid of his computer because of his porn addiction – y’know, the porn addition his wife called him out on before, (sarcasm warning) because she totally wasn’t having sexual fantasies about her doctor friend up until this point, and as we all know, lustful fantasies are only sinful if they involve the internet. Glad he took a baseball bat to the screen, his Quicken files or wedding photos or any other pieces of helpful, useful, important data might have survived! (/sarcasm) Or did he only have a computer for porn and do nothing of value on it at all, even in 2008? If he was using Turbotax and didn’t have a backup of his tax records, he’s just committed a crime and he’ll probably need those tax records in divorce court, but that’s not a big deal, I guess. Anyway, he doubled down on cutting out all the things that were getting in the way of his focus on his marriage, even though it’s several weeks into “The Love Dare” and she still hasn’t given him any indication that his efforts were anything but futile. Again, this is bothersome because of its underlying implication: either Cameron has attained massive amounts of faith two weeks into his salvation, or we have lazy script writers who treated reconciliation as inevitable. Look, I’m all about faith that can move mountains, and it’s incredible to see. I’ve witnessed it in my own life, in the life of friends, and growing up in church means that hearing such testimonies are wonderfully common. I just don’t expect it in two weeks’ time from someone facing a divorce with no indication that the divorce isn’t inevitable. Nehemiah rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem with the building materials in one hand, and a weapon in the other (Neh 4:17), and it would not be any less an expression of faith for Cameron to continue The Love Dare while simultaneously preparing for the divorce.

Now, we get to the dying father-in-law whose surgery, conveniently, cost the exact amount he just so happened to have had in savings for his boat. Anyone who didn’t predict exactly what happened as soon as the numbers were revealed to be so elegantly aligned gets to go sit in the corner and think about that. Anyway, our friend the wife believes her doctor friend just gave $24,000 to save her dad, and that a “thank you lunch” was going to settle the books. Sorry, I’ve yet to meet a saved person who would do something like that with a tenth of that amount, and she just assumes a “thank you so much” is going to cover that, in that context? No, it doesn’t. Her almost comical inability to express even the slightest skepticism in the doctor’s motives is the only reason why we have the big reveal at the end. That level of egregious naiveté went beyond lazy writing to outright insulting.

We then come to find out that he gave up his boat to save her dad, and we’re all floored by the level of sacrifice shown here, as well we should be…because this is either the most incredible demonstration of faith in God ever scripted into a film, or he is so royally incompetent and thoroughly lacking wisdom or common sense that he should probably run for public office. I know I keep harping on this, but it’s very important: she said “I want out”. Anyone here been through divorce court and have the husband win? Especially the kind of husband acting the way he was up until the past week? No. No you have not. She has not said anything indicating that the divorce papers he found on the counter were negotiable. As far as he knew, he was going to end up in divorce court despite all of his efforts to make things right. If he had half a brain cell, he’d know he was going to need that money for his legal fees. If not the fees directly, that savings account is guaranteed to be a prime target for the settlement because “she paid all the bills”. If she can prove that, the judge isn’t stopping at simply giving her half. Spent or not, that pile of money has got a big red bullseye on it once the court proceedings start. Divorce court doesn’t look at money you presently have available to you, or how you spent it, the judge looks at gross earnings over the course of the marriage.

Moreover, it was rather miraculous that the father-in-law recovered, and did so as readily as he did. Really, it was more likely that the father-in-law would have had complications which would have left them in massive medical debt, divorce court would have been how Cameron spent his accumulated vacation time, and if his $24,000 nest egg wasn’t spent either writing checks to her or his lawyer, it would have been quite helpful to cover rent for his studio apartment while he gets his pay garnished through alimony checks. He’ll likely end up living at the firehouse for quite some time. Is it any less faith to have a conversation to check to see if his wife’s mind has changed at all? Isn’t is simply wisdom to ask if she’s willing to give him a bit more time to prove that he’s truly making changes that we, the audience, know he is? The audience knows that she has been softening and reconsidering, but he doesn’t. While some might say “well duh! of course it’s not faith if you know things are going to go more smoothly!” I’ll retort, “at what point in the movie do we see God giving him a clear sign that it was His will to do what he did?” It’s true faith if it’s clear God called him to clean out his bank account and help someone in need. It is a gamble if he’s “doing the right thing because of convenient circumstances” with no clarity one way or the other. If he’s helping his father-in-law with the express intent of his wife ultimately finding out as she does in the film, then it’s not faith, and it’s not altruism, it’s very expensive manipulation with a coincidentally positive outcome. No matter how this act is pitched, it’s got massive problems in direct conflict with biblical principles, but since the marriage is restored and the father-in-law survives, this is overlooked.

What does his wife do upon hearing that the surgery got paid for by her husband? Well *then* she tells her man candy that she’s going to remain faithful to her husband – the kind of thing that any unsaved, secular humanist woman would do. Her husband not treating her well established a vacuum for doctor friend to fill, and his change in behavior removed the emotional need for her to have a guy on the side. There was ZERO sacrifice on her end – the doctor was used while he was needed and then let go. She refused to acknowledge effort and intermediate steps, she did nothing but point out her husband’s failures and shortcomings, she didn’t show any sign of reciprocity toward him (instead putting that effort into her man on the side), and this is all a result of her not only saying that she wanted out, but going to a lawyer without him to get the paperwork for it while actively pursuing an emotional bond with her doctor friend? Let’s call it what it was: she cheated on her husband until it was convenient for her not to. No, she didn’t have sex…but I’ll debate anyone who says that a physical sexual act is cheating, but actively pursuing another person as an emotional replacement while intentionally and consistently giving your husband the cold shoulder isn’t. She asked for the divorce, got the paperwork, didn’t show her husband any level of appreciation for his attempts to change before he bet the farm, cheated on him, and somehow she’s the victim in all this because he yells and wants a boat? Sorry, I’m fresh out of sympathy.

…And, once his sacrifice comes to light and she finds the book, she completely reconsiders, takes the divorce off the table, puts her wedding ring back on, they have their slow motion silhouette kiss in the firehouse, she has her come-to-Jesus moment, and they live happily ever after. Of course the filmmakers wanted to express some form of equality, so they had Cameron’s father character indicate that the roles were reversed when they did the love dare. I’ll simply take them on faith at this point, because there’s about a thousand questions I have regarding this arrangement…but really, it again felt more like a sales pitch to ensure that it was clear that women could try the things in the book, too.

Now, all of that being said, I really, really am glad for all the positivity the movie has expressed. I am grateful for all the hearts and lives it touched. I am grateful that there is even a forum where people go to help each other get through the more difficult dares in place. I believe The Love Dare is ultimately a good thing for Christian culture, I believe it’s a good thing for our society, and I absolutely believe it’s scripture-inspired…I truly and sincerely believe that God can use anything to advance His kingdom and reveal His glory. However, Fireproof is incredibly one-sided, tenuous in its adherence to scriptural principles, sets unreasonable expectations for both sides, is imbalanced in how it assigns responsibility, and wraps everything in a neat little bow in order to ensure that everyone who saw it got the warm and fuzzies when it was over – because if there’s anything that is more cliché in a Christian movie than a come-to-Jesus montage, it’s a perfectly neat and thoroughly predictable ending. After all, if the movie ended with Cameron’s wife following through with the divorce anyway, Cameron declaring bankruptcy, the father-in-law dying, and Cameron having to rebuild his life from the ground up being a missionary in a third world country that lacked running water, The Love Dare wouldn’t have hit the New York Times’ bestseller list and churches wouldn’t be showing it at their annual Married Couples Weekend Getaways.

Edit: Made some grammatical changes and rewordings for clarity.
Second Edit: Some more clarity changes.

November 3, 2016 by Philosophy and Faith 3

Beware your biases…and how they’re being reinforced

Go and read these two articles. I’ll wait.

http://lifehacker.com/how-sites-like-google-and-facebook-put-you-in-political-1787659102

http://lifehacker.com/this-graphic-explains-20-cognitive-biases-that-affect-y-1730901381

Did you read them both? Good. Now go read them again. I’ll wait.

Did you read them a second time? Half of you didn’t, and the other half didn’t read them the first time, so I’ll summarize.

The first article describes the fact that Facebook and Google tell you what they think you want to hear. Are you conservative? Don’t expect any liberal news in your Facebook feed. Are you liberal? Don’t expect Google News to show you conservative articles. Maybe you’re a person who prefers an echo chamber. That’s your right, but I would encourage you to at least recognize that it is a right you are exercising.

The second article is a bit less social media specific, and talks about the psychology behind our own self-built echo chamber. Are you more worried about being killed by ISIS, or by a car accident? Most people are worried about ISIS, but the ISIS death toll, as of January, is a bit under 19,000 people, exactly half as many who died in car accidents just in 2015. This is an example of “Salience”, number 16 on the list of cognitive biases we face as humans.

It’s vitally important to be aware of these things when making decisions, be it what cell phone to get, or who to vote for. Know what’s manipulating the information you’re using to make a decision…and whether you’re really making a decision in the first place.

October 16, 2016 by Microblog Philosophy and Faith 0

Finally…simple instructions for dealing with the VirtualBox/VMWare problem

Having a VMWare ESXi server at home has made it incredibly helpful to find deployable OVA appliances for testing and tweaking. It’s very common to find OVAs that are made in VirtualBox. I don’t fault people for this, but it seems that neither VMWare nor Oracle want to blink with respect to making OVAs interoperate without throwing errors. In my attempt to get a test rollout of LogicalDoc, I came across this very problem. I was thus incredibly happy to find this little tutorial that is excellent and effective.

http://www.itsecurenet.com/virtualbox-ova-to-vsphere-ovf/

Thanks, whoever wrote that!!

September 29, 2016 by Computers and Tech 0

Star Trek looks good at 50. Society doesn’t.

I saw a blog post earlier today regarding Star Trek. The core point it made was that Star Trek assumed a post-scarcity world in some respects, while not in others, and that there truly isn’t such a thing as a post-scarcity world possible. The example used was the concept of the Neutral Zone, and that space could be owned in a world where famine was a thing of the past because of replicators.

I don’t think it’s hypocritical to assume that there would still be a need for rules in a society where everybody is fed and housed and actively contributing to society. Gene Roddenberry most definitely modeled the Star Trek universe as one where communism was successful and worked out as Karl Marx envisioned. It’s amongst the things that makes the optimism of Star Trek attractive. However, the concept of ‘ownership’ is still very much alive and well. It’s not “everybody’s uniform”, it’s “Picard’s uniform”. It’s not ‘everybody’s starship’, it’s the Federation Starship Enterprise. Possession hasn’t gone away.

However, Star Trek only works because it operates under the assumption that man is basically good. The series generally reflects this. However, “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few” is noble when involving self-sacrifice, but easily leads to tyranny of the majority at a societal level.

There were plenty of assumptions about how things would go in a post-scarcity society in Star Trek, and yes, it’s a near-utopian place where there is little want. However, there is another depiction of a post-scarcity society where everyone is taken care of: Wall-E.

Life aboard the Axiom is a life-long vacation, filled with swimming pools and virtual golf and smoothie cups and screens plastered in ads – and they didn’t even have holodecks! Side note: the least believable thing about The Next Generation was that fifteen year old Wesley Crusher had access to a holodeck and used them for scientific simulations…I’ve got some lovely beachfront property in Siberia to sell you.

What stopped the Enterprise from being the Axiom? What stops people from being endless consumers and causes them to desire to contribute and achieve the level of excellence they demonstrate? Because the way the world is right now, there is nothing to demonstrate to me that the level of self-determination evident in the Star Trek universe is any more fictitious than warp drive, inertial dampeners, or transporters.

And after my years of providing tech support, I believe that I’ll see warp drive long before I’ll see a society with an internal drive to better itself.

September 8, 2016 by Philosophy and Faith 1

No sex in the Prayer Room

Back in 1999, comedian Chris Rock did a song entitled ‘No Sex in the Champagne Room’, informing listeners that, despite any claims made by a stripper, that there is no possibility that said act will actually happen. He did, incidentally, give the most accurate horoscope ever given in that song, indicating that each sign was ‘gonna die’.

Now, I’m not saying that I think couples should copulate in a church’s prayer room as a general practice. My thought goes a bit deeper. Those of you who are reading this who grew up in church, think about what most churches say about sex: “Don’t do it independent of marriage”. Now obviously, yes, that is a biblical principle that certainly should be made clear, for plenty of reasons. I don’t dispute that. Here’s the part that I find curiously – and consistently – absent in the church: the other part where married couples are unilaterally encouraged to engage in sex. The youth group is all told ‘don’t have sex’. Married couples are told…not much, because the stipulation no longer applies to them, and…they’ll figure it out, I guess?

Perhaps this is just a limitation of perspective as I’m not married myself, but why isn’t there some form of sex ed in churches with marriage ministries? It’s a cultural catch-22 because it’s both shameful for people to imagine someone having sex with their spouse, and it’s also shameful for people to know that they don’t have sex with their spouse. I’ve yet to step foot in a church that has any sort of specifically assigned ‘time and place’ to discuss sex within marriages, nor have I ever had a discussion with a married couple with regards to their sex life.

Now, the most likely thought being had here is, “but that’s private and personal, just between them!” Well, to be fair to this point, it’s certainly up to a given couple as to whether they would be okay discussing sex with someone who isn’t a part of that marriage, and due to cultural norms, it’s certainly not the kind of topic that is likely to ‘just come up’. However, I’ve somehow managed to speak with married couples about their jobs, their children’s health, their food allergies, their pre-marital dating story, their finances (including a near-foreclosure), their medical problems, their military service, their political inclinations, and in one case, their spouse’s infidelity. Somehow all of those things can ‘just come up’ over the course of a social visit or computer repair, but whether they preferred vaginal penetration or anal penetration has never once come up? Or does the fact that you probably had a response that was something to the effect of “uhm…can you tone it down a bit?” a symptom of the very matter at hand?

Find me one other blessing from God that is as socially repressed as marital sex. Find me one other topic that is as explicitly discussed in the Bible as a God-given gift, that is as ignored by most churches as sex among their married members (and no, interdenominational doctrinal differences about whether the gifts of the Holy Spirit are still a thing doesn’t count). As the Body of Christ, we can do better. God’s wonderful gift of sex deserves better. The Body of Christ itself deserves better.

August 19, 2016 by Philosophy and Faith 5

The Zombie Cable Box

I’m almost certain that none of my readers have any interest whatsoever in my cable box project, but I had a development this weekend. I’d love to be running MythTV, but since Cablevision insists on putting the Copy Once flag on about 2/3 of the channels I get, so that’s not practical for me (I pine for FiOS still…). Thus, I am stuck with Windows Media Center, which itself isn’t the worst thing ever because WMC is actually an excellent frontend when it works.

The problem, as you might have guessed, is that it hasn’t been working.

About three weeks ago, I installed a heatsink on my DVR, and apparently it got stuck in a boot loop after a botched patch. I was hoping to be able to restore it, because recordings with the copy once flag wouldn’t play on a rebuild. However, after about three hours of poking at it, no dice, so a rebuild it was.

I reinstalled Windows 7, let it sit to download its updates…and then I got back into the boot loop issue again. I then tried Windows Vista (with 5GB of RAM, an actual GPU, an SSD, and a 3.4GHz Core 2 Duo, it’s actually quite usable), which worked wonderfully..except it doesn’t support my HDHomeRun Prime properly. I would’ve gone to Windows 8, but apparently it’s not possible to activate a Media Pack serial number anymore, even though I already have one.

So, I managed to find a place on the internet (not the shady side of the internet, a forum for people like me) where the procedures were found to get Media Center running on Windows 10. It took two installations of Win10 to do it, and I still have to tweak my firewall to only allow it to get guide data (not a fan of Win10 Telemetry), but I finally have my cable box back up and running again.

August 1, 2016 by Computers and Tech Microblog 2

Cynicism

I get accused of being a cynic. A lot. There’s definitely a level of truth to it.

Yesterday, I was at 7-11, and there was a sign that I could use the mobile app to pay bills with cash. This seemed like an interesting and helpful tool (I frequently receive cash from clients), but I immediately dismissed the idea when I realized that 7-11 would have a list of my bills and when I paid them, something that is already being used by a number of companies for their benefit, not mine. Using such an app would produce additional insight regarding the fact that I’m paying with cash, which store I do it in, what time of day, and how frequently.

I may well be a cynic, but since virtually every app is doing some form of data collection these days, it’s a tough sell for me to get excited about an app anymore. This is coming from someone who used to jailbreak his iPhone to get apps before the App Store opened its intangible doors.
…posted from the WordPress app.

July 20, 2016 by Computers and Tech Microblog Philosophy and Faith 2

Long Time, No See

I’m guessing that most of you won’t be reading this for quite some time. See, apparently the strategy of ‘letting your domain lapse and re-buying it’ isn’t a good one, because ‘waiting it out’ isn’t the 30-day-or-so wait I thought it would be. Apparently, Verisign holds on to domains for quite some time after they expire, only allowing me to re-purchase it for several hundred dollars until its ‘release’. Now, to be fair, HostISO was willing to purchase the domain on my behalf and let it sit long enough to transfer, an offer for which I turned them down…but I have definitely learned that Hostgator has it right…and basically everyone else is a bad idea. Resultantly, I’m writing these as a result of a manually-edited hosts file, rather than having squared away my domain woes, which I cannot wait to resolve.

There has been so much going on, and yet I sit here, uncertain what to blog about. I guess I’ll start with the technical – one of the clients at work has put me amidst some uncharted territory. While I usually use the excellent Turnkey Linux project to perform one-off tasks and run self-hosted, browser-based software, I am finding myself in a place which requires Virtualmin, since I need to handle multiple subdomains. Since Virtualmin doesn’t play too well with TKL, I’m doing my first ever web server from scratch with Debian. It’s been quite a learning process. Similarly, while I haven’t been able to get my copy at home working the way I want, the excellent Teampass project is working well at my job, replacing our prior system that had a one-at-a-time thing going on that got in the way with obnoxious frequency. I’m also keeping an eye on Open365. It seems to fit the bill for my collaborative spreadsheet needs described a while back, but its docker-based install process is a bit smoother on paper than it ends up being in practice. I’m sure it’ll improve in the coming releases.

At the church where I do technical things, there’s lots of things coming soon, though there’s a whole lot of moving and shaking I’m hoping to get done in the summer months. I end up with an incredible number of questions regarding what I should do next, and implementation is its own set of challenges I look forward to tackling, though we’re all of a similar mindset that trying to get everything in place before our November meeting is ambitious, to say the least. I really think it is doable, but I must remember to consistently ask myself whether it’s doable because it’s what I think is best and I’m looking for God’s green light, or if it’s truly the direction in which I’m supposed to be going.

At a personal level, I’ve been dealing with a greater need for ‘adulting’; it’s becoming pretty clear that my desire to grow up at a child was woefully misplaced. I hate coming home because ‘coming home’ invariably means ‘dishes and laundry’. I miss the other life stages.

July 10, 2016 by Uncategorized 1